Thursday, January 18, 2018

Microsoft demands your mobile number for Windows 10 setup

Microsoft wants your phone number when you set up their Windows 10 (build 17063) Operating System.


A part of the global surveillance policies in 'force'.

Your phone number is a piece of data that is tied in to your 'person's' name.

Your person's name is the most important piece of information in a legal matter for without that there can be no 'accused'.

Is this a step towards where every 'person' on the internet is 'guilty' until proven otherwise, with their alleged actions?

We do not recommend the purchase of products that contain Microsoft's Operating System

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

Net neutrality

Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers must treat all data on the Internet the same, and not discriminate or charge differently by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or method of communication.[4] For instance, under these principles, internet service providers are unable to intentionally block, slow down or charge money for specific websites and online content.

This is what's really happening;

Tuesday, January 16, 2018

Invasion Day Hawaii 17 January

While the people of Australia are debating the 26th of January as Invasion Day rather than Australia Day,

where a lesser known fact is that this is when Martial Law was officially installed on the land,

and another lesser known fact is that on the 28th of April 1770, the land of Australia became a 'possession' of the UK in the name of then Monarch King George III,

spare a  thought for the good people of Hawaii.

'Big Business' from the United States f_cked over the good people and the Queen of Hawaii on the 17th of January 1893, and installed military rule on the people of the islands.

Those rascal colonialists.

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Huawei and ZTE banned by the US government

'Consumer' grade communications electronics, e.g. routers, modems, phones are (deliberate by design) unsecured devices.

We have mentioned that Microsoft's BitLocker encryption has vulnerabilities;

Now the lawmakers of the United States have put through law that forbids people in government using hardware manufactured by Huawei or ZTE as shown in article within screenshot;

Just one aspect of secure communications is the use of https:// in web addresses as opposed to the not so secure http://.

In order to be assured of some sort of security, login links for quite some time contain the address https://, however ZTE have deliberately omitted the https protocol in favour of the more vulnerable http to gain access as administrator to their hardware.

In the above illustration the web browser warns that the connection is not secure i.e http://

The company TP-Link also has this not secure mode of login to their routers.

We therefore do not recommend the purchase or use of Huawei, TP-Link or ZTE.

Optus sells Huawei modems to Australia's 'consumers'.

Optus and Virgin also sell ZTE pocket wifi devices.

Microsoft BitLocker vulnerabilities

For those who think that their (Microsoft) BitLocker encrypted storage device is safe from prying eyes from the corporation aggregate commonly referred to as government, think again.

As documented by the NSA (National Security Agency) of the USA;

Kindly brought to you by Edward Snowden.


Friday, January 12, 2018

How to deal with a sheriff's warrant

Many people's first contact with the "SHERIFF'S OFFICE VICTORIA" is in the form of a template letter stating that the "natural person" has outstanding warrants to a particular value.

As of this writing, the template letter has a scanned signature and a name of Brendan Facey, stating that he is the "Sheriff of Victoria".

In accordance with the law, specifically the Infringements Act 2006, S3 on "execution copy" states:

"execution copy", in relation to an infringement warrant, means the copy issued for the purposes of execution and includes an execution copy comprising a number of infringement warrants consolidated under section 86; 

as seen in the scanned document below:

Note: The burden of proof is on the accuser.

If you have obtained notification either verbal or in writing that the sheriff is stating that there are warrants in your person's name, demand that the sheriff produce;

1). Copies of the (alleged) warrants See: warrant form,
2). the "execution copy".

as required by law.

If the above documents are not produced and further action is carried out against your person, then the due process of law has not been followed, where your person has obtained financial damage, where you have a course of action against;

1). the (alleged) sheriff, Mr. Brendan Facey,
3), the issuing person from the court,

or other persons associated with your matter.

See also the hidden video:
Sheriff's warrants do not exist - verified on video

Thursday, January 11, 2018

Lose the name win the game Fact or Fiction?

Some people may have heard the catch phrase;

"Lose the name win the game", where currently a search engine result points to 7,690,000 references.

In order to hold one accountable for one's actions the most important element in a court room, is the 'persons' name.

Without that there can be no case.

Many people should also be aware of the saying "knowledge is power" where today a researcher can obtain this with far less legwork than one did a generation ago, prior to the vast resources of the internet.

With that comes the fact that people are becoming more aware that (for example) fines are not being issued honestly by the Australian authorities.

As a result the authorities are responding, where now you do not know the name of your accuser as shown in the example of a fine or "Infringement Notice"

where in this case the Issuing Officer is the number 127.

The fundamental laws in this country give you the right to know the name of your accuser.

A right that has currently been taken away.

How does that saying go again? - "Nothing to hide nothing to fear", right?

Are these the actions of honest authorities?

Tuesday, January 9, 2018

Top Cop Graham Ashton head of organisation committing criminal offences?

So it seems that the CEO of an organisation committing criminal offences is back in 'business'.

Can you make your allegations of criminal activities stick???

Just a reminder that the police hand out fines 'unlawfully';

See document;

Ex Victorian police officer comments on fines at:

Monday, January 8, 2018

ATO is swindling Australians

So, among other points, just a reminder that;

1). The ATO (Australian Tax Office) is NOT a legal entity,

2). The ATO was NOT established according to the correct 'lawful' procedure,

3). The people were not informed according to law, within the Government Gazette.


"Junior officers are routinely destroying people's lives"

See parts of a document tendered into court;

Australian Defence Force personnel allowed to get away with crime?

It sure does look like the old saying "crime does not pay" does not hold true when you're a member of the Australian Defence Force.

When it comes to criminal activity, not only does it seem that the 'administration' is above the law, but also its foot soldiers.

When a member of the serf population does not pay unlawfully issued fines by corporations, one can spend over a year in gaol, but when one is a member of an arm of the administration one can commit criminal activity AND get away with it, meaning IF you get caught you may have to pay it back and if you can't pay it back you do not get incarcerated.

Just another policy showing the serfs that the administration is above the law in this penal colony.

Australia's Internet speed ranking falls yet again!

It seems that Australia's Mutts in Parliament (MPs) really really despise their slave population or are just plain incompetent, in any event they should realistically be removed from their occupying positions.

To be fair on them they factually 'governed' (i.e. restricted) internet speeds for Australia's 'consumers', IF that was their intention to do so.

IF not, then they cannot get right a basic service (telecommunications), making matters worse as it's something that is their very own resource, something that they've had since the 1960's which makes them look like incompetent imbeciles.

Australia's internet speed rating now sits at 55.

Some people may take the piss out of Kazakhstan, but those goat herders can serf the web on the back of a goat quicker than a convict in Collingwood.

Bit of laughing stock ye 'ol business called the 'Australian Government'.

See what wrote about this matter within the headline:

Australia's internet speed ranking falls two places to 55th fastest in the world

Australia has fallen two places on a global ranking of internet speeds to 55 as the National Broadband Network looks to be completed by 2020.

A monthly ranking by the Speedtest Global Index placed Australia at number 55 for fixed broadband speeds in the world for December 2017, with an average download speed of 25.88 Megabits per second (Mbps).

One place above with 25.96 Mbps was Kazakhstan and one place below was the United Arab Emirates with 25.69 Mbps.

In first place was Singapore with a lightning-quick download speed of 161.21 Mbps.

An NBN spokesperson told The Australian that our poor internet speeds should lift once more Australians connect to the network. Approximately three million Australian homes are currently connected and using the NBN.

"This means that the majority of data being captured by these kind of reports are being generated by the five million or so legacy services on slower ADSL ser­vices," the spokesman said.

"As these premises switch to the NBN and we move towards our target of eight million activated NBN premises by 2020, we expect to see the overall fixed-broadband speeds in Australia ­increase significantly."

Speedtest develops its ranking systems using data gleaned from users who go to its site to gauge how fast their internet is – and much like restaurant reviews, it's likely that people who were experiencing poor internet would go to the site to see how bad it was.

Under the NBN, Australians would have access to several different speed "tiers", based on which retailer the user purchased their NBN connection plan with.

For example, Telstra's standard evening speed tier offers users a minimum download speed of 15 Mbps during peak evening times from 7pm – 11pm.

Online streaming service Netflix recommends an internet speed of 3.0 Mbps to watch movies and television series in standard definition.

The Speedtest Global Index also ranked users based on their mobile internet speeds, where Australia ranked in 7th place with a an average download speed of 48.87 Mbps.

Friday, January 5, 2018

Police cover-up migrant crime wave created by the people in government

The people in government assure the consumers in Australia that the three arms of government function independently of each other, without bias or influence.

To remind the lay person, the three (allegedly) independent arms of government are:

1). Executive :- The Queen (U.K. Monarch) and NOT the unlawful paper entity the queen of Australia, Governor General

2). Parliament :- Ministers of Parliament, lawmakers

3). Judiciary :- Courts, police.

Let's take another important aspect that Australian case law should give the mass population the impression that no 'person' is above the law.

Very briefly;

The inception of police in Australia is that from a criminal element of society that being convicts, something no doubt our honest police force would rather the public not be aware of.

Tax slaves should also be aware that the police do not work for 'you' (the serfs) but rather the people in government, where the general population is literally the police force's enemy.

Another reminder is that the police are not answerable to the general population.

The police practice lies, deception,  false information, entrapment in order to obtain convictions against the general population, arising from policies from their 'bosses' the people in government.

The above ties the second and third arm of government together, therefore not independent as suggested.

The evidence of this is has reared its ugly head with regards to the very public crime wave by migrant Africans.

Please note that this crime wave is not new and has been around for over a dozen years with this specific migrant population, where the authorities have done very little to curb the 'problem'  where the good people of Australia are in harm's way in the hands of their government.

Bronwyn Bishop stated in 2015 that the first job of a government is to;

"look after the safety of its people"

a job that the current people in government failed at, where realistically they should be removed from their positions in government.

Since police are falsifying the reports of criminal activity;

how can you (the lay person) trust the police or even the people in government responsible for importing criminals into Australia?

Unless it's back to the policies of 1788 of this colony, where Martial  Law (officially) ruled for quite some time.

Crime, an excellent business for the people IN government, but not so good for the serf's on the receiving end of it.

The business called the 'Australia Government' importing terrorists, then creating laws to keep the good people of Australia 'safe'? WTF ??? !!! ???

STILL trust the people in Australia's government?

Wednesday, January 3, 2018

Government Fail Australia the best at it?

What does the future hold for the good Australian people in 2018?

IF 'priors' are anything to go by, then the good people of Australia are just going to get screwed hard by the people in government just like every other year where the best part about it is that they (the general population) are just going to take it.

So when one asks a search engine what a "government fail" is the following result is shown:

where the screen capture above states the following:

 Just as a market failure is not a failure to bring a particular or favored solution into existence at desired prices but is rather a problem which prevents the market from operating efficiently, a government failure is not a failure of the government to bring about a particular solution but is rather a systemic problem ...

 In Australia, the people in government have stated to the serf population that the;

"first job of a government is to look after the safety of its people".

See post:

Let's take a look at one example;

The people in government have decided to import migrants who deliberately have chosen to take criminal actions that cause harm to the good people of Australia.

In all likelihood the people in government had a fair idea that these migrants would cause harm to the good people of Australia, but in any event have still decided to import these migrants.

The people in government did not adhere to their public statement to "look after the safety of its people", therefore a;

Government Fail!

Let's have a look at another type of 'harm' caused by the people in government.

The people in the Australian Government have seconded others to take on many infrastructure projects, the likes of building roads, a desalination plant, railway upgrades and telecommunications backbone upgrades.

Many if not all of these projects have suffered a "budget blowout" (or money for mates deal), which in effect causes 'harm' to the public's tax dollars used for the funding.

Since there is no money taken out of the politician's own wallet, one can easily be of the opinion that the care factor is zero.

With the people in government expediting the importation of savages / corporate slaves (under the banner of 'human rights') from overseas who in turn harm the 'good' people of Australia, and not any politician or their families directly, these savages being new to water, electricity, automobiles and employment are all here under 'hue-man' rights courtesy of the Australian tax slaves, while good Australian people watch their children have their jobs taken away from them by cheap imported slave labour.

So where is the employment of 'human rights' for Australians to have a job to support their families?

Domestic violence as a result of lack of employment, a government created condition, is a "Government Fail"

The people in government deliberately do not plan for upgrades to infrastructure (water, electricity, roads, etc) needed to accommodate these newly imported criminals, where (e.g.) traffic congestion is created, causing pressure to families, an action that is seen as a deliberate assault on the family unit.

Instead of the government allowing for more megawatt production of electricity for the newly displaced savages to enjoy, the people in government disassemble electricity production plants citing some BS climate change occurrence, in effect causing more financial stress (i.e. harm) to the good people of Australia.

It seems that these Mutts in Parliament despise the good people of Australia, the people that they are supposed to 're-present'.

So, what's it going to be in 2018 ? "Same, same".

The people, by their inaction are stating that they are happy and content with the way they are 'governed'.

AUSTRALIA: the Concealed Colony!
(the book the federal police removed from bookstores!)

Tuesday, January 2, 2018

What is the first job of a government?

Just a reminder for the good people of Australia

On the Australian television program Q and A, which is broadcast on the ABC's (Australian Broadcasting Commission's) channel, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Bronwyn Bishop, stated on national television (12m:17s into the program) that:

" The first job of a government is to look after the safety of its people".


How many actions do you know that have been done by the 'government' (corporation conglomerate) that have NOT been for the safety of its people?